Legal Opinion

Grolier Society v. Freeman

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 29, 1932No. 22003PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

1. “WEere a contract prescribes conditions precedent to a party’s right to set up a cause of action or defense, and the terms are reasonable, the opposite party may usually successfully plead a failure to comply with the conditions, as a reason for the court’s refusal to entertain the action or defense. But forfeiture of rights is not favored, and the courts will readily seize upon circumstances arising in the subsequent conduct of transactions of the parties and imply a waiver, in order to prevent a forfeiture because of noncompliance with formal prerequisites.” McDaniel v. Mallary Bros.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McDaniel v. Mallary Bros. Machinery Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  2. Haralson v. SpeerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  3. Byck v. Weiler Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  4. Charles v. TylerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pearson v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
  2. Shanks v. CowartCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  3. Precision Label Industries, Inc. v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  4. State Highway Department v. Hall Paving Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  5. State Highway Department v. Hall Paving Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API