Legal Opinion

Schmitt v. Massachusetts Protective Assn. Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 21, 1927No. 25,808PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQuinn, J.

Action upon two health and accident policies issued by the defendant to plaintiff. The first policy is dated August 15, 1924, and provides for indemnity of $100 per week for total disability due to injury or disease. The second is dated May 15, 1925, and provides for -an indemnity of $50 per week. There was a verdict in favor of plaintiff. From an order denying its alternative motion for judgment or for a new trial, defendant appealed.

The policies are similar in form. In its answer the defendant denies that plaintiff’s disability was the result of illness originating within the period covered…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. MacK v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  2. Zimmerman v. Bankers Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  3. Schmitt v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  4. Gruberski v. Brotherhood of American YeomenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bullock v. New York Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  2. Bank Sav. Life Ins. Co. v. ButlerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
  3. Schmitt v. Massachusetts Protective Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
  4. Turner v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API