Legal Opinion
Weill v. Hecht
The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo
Decided October 15, 1895PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Action by Elie Weill and others against Henrietta Hecht on a guaranty. Judgment for plaintiffs.
1Opinion of the CourtMcADAM, J.
The action is on an instrument in these words:
“New York, Jan. 29th, 1894.
“In consideration of Elie Weill & Co., of Paris, Prance, extending further credit accommodations to the S. J. Held Company, of New York, I hereby guaranty to the said Elie Weill & Co. the prompt payment at maturity, by the said S. J. Held Company, of all moneys to become due to said Elie Weill & Co. for goods which they may buy and ship for the said S. J. Held Co., to the amount of twenty-five thousand francs, or the equivalent in United States gold coin. And it is understood that the purchases and shipments above…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- White v. . HoytNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Lawrence v. McCalmontSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
- Gates v. . McKeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1855
- Bank of California v. . WebbNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Beakes v. . DacunhaNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Fifth National Bank of Cincinnati v. WoolseyNew York Supreme Court · 1897