Legal Opinion
Codrington v. Dolak
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided April 26, 2024No. 3:21-cv-00665Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION KARIM CODRINGTON Plaintiff v. Civil Action No. 3:21-cv-665-RGJ OFFICER JAY DOLAK, et al. Defendants * * * * * MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Officer Jay Dolak (“Dolak”), Officer Tyler Blissett (“Blissett”), Officer John Kirk (“Kirk”), Officer Steve Conrad (“Conrad”), and Louisville-Jefferson County Metro Government (“Metro”) (collectively, “Defendants”) moved for summary judgment. [DE 26]. Plaintiff Karim Codrington (“Codrington”) responded, and Defendants replied. [DE 40; DE 43]. Defendants also filed a second motion…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.