Legal Opinion

United States v. Brinston

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided March 23, 1989No. ACM 27269PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

FORAY, Senior Judge:

Pursuant to his pleas, appellant was convicted by a general court-martial of five offenses of failing to go to his appointed place of duty, wrongful use of marijuana, and two offenses alleging bank fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1344, in violation of Articles 86, 112a, and 134, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 886, 912a, 934, respectively. The approved sentence extends to a bad conduct discharge, confinement for 16 months, forfeiture of $500.00 per month for 18 months, and reduction to the lowest enlisted grade.

For the first time on appeal, appellant claims that the general…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. OrtizUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1965
  2. United States v. KugimaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1966
  3. United States v. FieldsU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1984
  4. United States v. SheltonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1988

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. BrinstonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989
  2. United States v. BrinstonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  3. United States v. KnightU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API