Legal Opinion

Brown v. Department of Labor & Industries

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1925No. 19181. Department OnePublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBridges, J.

— The question in this, case is whether the complainant has a valid claim against the state industrial insurance fund because of the death of her husband.

The facts are stipulated: The deceased was in the employ of the Washington Iron Works, located in the city of Seattle, and while so engaged his work was extra-hazardous, within the contemplation of the state workmen’s compensation act. Under the terms of his employment he commenced work at 7:30 o’clock in the morning and ceased at 4 o’clock in the afternoon, and received certain hourly compensation. On May 1 of last year he concluded his…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cudahy Packing Co. Of Nebraska v. ParramoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Lumberman's Reciprocal Ass'n. v. BehnkenTexas Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Stertz v. Industrial Insurance CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  4. De Constantin v. Public Service CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Procaccino v. E. Horton & SonsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Kyle v. Greene High SchoolSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
  2. Hilding v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  3. State Ex Rel. Gallet v. Clearwater Timber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Maeda v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Haaga v. Saginaw Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API