Legal Opinion
Caplan v. CNA Financial Corp.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided August 20, 2008No. C 06-5865 CWPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND DENYING DEFENDANTS’ CROSS-MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES
CLAUDIA WILKEN, District Judge.
Plaintiff David Caplan moves for an award of attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in prosecuting this action and for an award of pre-judgment interest. Defendants Hartford Life Group Insurance Company (Hartford) and CNA Long-Term Disability Plan (the Plan) 1 oppose this motion and cross-move to recover attorneys’ fees incurred in defending against Plaintiffs claim for breach of fiduciary duty. The matter was taken under submission on the papers.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Moreno v. City of SacramentoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Gates v. DeukmejianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Oster v. Standard InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2011
- Dragu v. Motion Picture Industry Health Plan for Active ParticipantsDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2016
- Heat and Frost Insulators of Northern California Local Union No. 16 Health and Welfare Trust Fund v. Rhodium Integrated ServicesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
- Neumiller v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023
- Sprint Communications Company L.P. v. Charter Communications, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2020