Legal Opinion

Paradis v. Town of Schroeppel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 21, 2001PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unani*1028mously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs and judgment granted in accordance with the following Memorandum: Plaintiffs commenced this action alleging that defendant Town Board of the Town of Schroeppel (Town Board) lacked the authority to amend the local zoning law by its resolution, despite a provision in the Town of Schroeppel Zoning Law (Zoning Law) that specifically allows for that manner of amendment. The Town Board purported to amend the Zoning Law by resolutions in 1991 and 1999. Supreme Court erred in granting in its entirety defendants’ motion…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. BingNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Gallagher v. ReganNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Eastern Shopping Centers, Inc. v. Trenholm Motels, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
  4. Naftal Associates v. Town of BrookhavenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  5. Rockland Properties Corp. v. Town of BrookhavenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. New York v. Shinnecock Indian NationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2007
  2. Brunswick Smart Growth, Inc. v. Town BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. Matter of Calverton Manor, LLC v. Town of RiverheadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
  4. Matter of Calverton Manor, LLC v. Town of RiverheadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
  5. Matter of Koldin v. City of SchenectadyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API