Legal Opinion

Anton Ivezaj and Ljena Doljevic v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 28, 1996No. 94-3898PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOGGS, Circuit Judge.

Anton Ivezaj and Ljena Doljevic, husband and wife, appeal from a determination by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) that the couple is not entitled to asylum or withholding of deportation. The BIA had affirmed the decision of an Immigration Judge (IJ) who granted Ivezaj and Doljevic the privilege of voluntary departure after denying their application for asylum and withholding of deportation. For the reasons given below, we affirm the BIA’s decision.

I

Anton Ivezaj, age 29, and Ljena Doljevic, age 23, were citizens of the former Yugoslavia when they departed from…

2Cases cited19 opinions

Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
Immigration & Naturalization Service v. StevicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
The Japanese Immigrant CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
Maryam Hartooni v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
Vaso and Djela Perkovic v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

Guennadi Y. Mikhailevitch v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
Aguilar-Solis v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
Luce Gilaj and Luigj Gilaj v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
Youri K. Koliada v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
Sefit Ramani Lindita Ramani and Ardit Ramani v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.