Legal Opinion

State v. Barrick

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided April 18, 2002No. 20010027-CAPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BENCH, Judge:

1 1 Defendants Amber Barrick and Travis Johnston appeal from conditional guilty pleas to one count each of attempted forgery. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

12 Defendants allegedly found or otherwise acquired a money order,. The money order had the signature and address of the purchaser, but the payee line was blank. The purchaser apparently bought the money order to pay a utility bill and did not know either Defendant. One of the Defendants wrote Amber Barrick on the blank payee line, endorsed the money order, and then cashed it. Defendants were charged with Forgery, a third degree…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hanchett v. BurbidgeUtah Supreme Court · 1921
  2. State v. SinghCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1991
  3. Hercules Inc. v. Utah State Tax CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2000
  4. People v. PoolSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
  5. State v. GorhamUtah Supreme Court · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. HobbsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2003
  2. State v. Quinonez-GaitonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2002
  3. State v. MadsenCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API