Legal Opinion

State v. Burcklee

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 15, 1894PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On certiorari bringing up a judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of the county of Passaic.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Reed, J.

The insistence of the counsel for the prosecutors Is that the Court of Common Pleas, instead of proceeding to hear the case, should have dismissed the appeal on the ground that no bond had been filed within the statutory period, by the appellants.

The facts appearing upon the record sent up are these: Burckle sued the Delaneys in the Paterson District Court on a note for $100. On January 10th, 1893, judgment was given in favor of the defendant and for defendant’s costs of suit, setting out the items.

On January 12th, a notice of appeal was given,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kneedler v. LaneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1863

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Camden Fire Ins. Ass'n v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  2. Pendlebury v. Passaic Valley Sewerage CommissionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1945
  3. Pioneer Mining Co. v. TibergDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1913
  4. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API