Legal Opinion

Fleet v. Hertz

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1903PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the First District;—heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Frank Baker, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Boggs

The appellant brought a replevin suit against the sheriff of Cook county to replevin a lot of furs. He executed a replevin bond to the coroner of the county in the sum of $7000, obtained a writ of replevin, by virtue whereof the furs were taken by the coroner and delivered to him. The replevin suit was dismissed, and this an action of debt was instituted in the circuit court of Cook county against the appellant, and one Lehman, as surety, on the replevin bond in the name of the appellee Hertz, the coroner, for the use of James H. Gilbert, the sheriff of said county, from whose possession the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Murch v. WrightIllinois Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Chickering v. BastressIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Michigan Central Railroad v. PhillipsIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Lonergan v. StewartIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  5. Lenz v. HarrisonIllinois Supreme Court · 1893

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Edwards v. Baldwin Piano Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1920
  2. D. M. Ferry & Co. v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  3. In re FlandersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1905
  4. Sherman & Sons v. United Clothing StoresCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
  5. Wiegert v. Davis Cleaning & Dyeing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API