Legal Opinion
Murray v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 25, 1993No. Civ. A. 92-0119 (LFO), 92-0120 (LFO)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
OBERDORFER, District Judge.
In these consolidated cases, the plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, challenges the delay in the execution of a detainer lodged by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts with the District of Columbia Department of Corrections. Plaintiffs principal contention is that defendants violated his rights under the Interstate Agreement on Detainers, D.C.Code § 24-701. Defendants have filed a motion to dismiss or for summary judgment, and plaintiff has responded to the motion. In addition, plaintiff has filed an amended complaint, which will be treated as a motion for…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. PaigeDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2004
- James Murray v. Warden Lewisburg USPCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- State v. PayneOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- Cathey v. BerryhillDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021
- Dunbar v. State of N H , et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.