Legal Opinion

State v. Rosenbaum

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 2, 1979No. 2 CA-CR 1699Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HATHAWAY, Judge.

Appellant was indicted for obtaining money by fraudulent scheme or artifice, A.R.S. Sec. 13-320.01, and second-degree conspiracy to obtain money by false or fraudulent representations, A.R.S. Sec. 13— 331(B), as amended.

On August 23, 1978, appellant agreed to plead guilty to a charge of obtaining money, property, or valuable consideration by false pretense, A.R.S. Sec. 13-312, an open ended offense, treatable as a misdemeanor or a felony. The agreement provided that the original charges in the indictment would be dismissed as to appellant upon acceptance of his guilty…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Miller v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  3. State v. BrockingtonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  4. Green v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API