State v. Rosenbaum
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HATHAWAY, Judge.
Appellant was indicted for obtaining money by fraudulent scheme or artifice, A.R.S. Sec. 13-320.01, and second-degree conspiracy to obtain money by false or fraudulent representations, A.R.S. Sec. 13— 331(B), as amended.
On August 23, 1978, appellant agreed to plead guilty to a charge of obtaining money, property, or valuable consideration by false pretense, A.R.S. Sec. 13-312, an open ended offense, treatable as a misdemeanor or a felony. The agreement provided that the original charges in the indictment would be dismissed as to appellant upon acceptance of his guilty…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Miller v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- State v. BrockingtonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
- Green v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977