Legal Opinion

Gehres v. Ater

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1947No. 30804PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The principal question of law presented is whether the facts pleaded in the plaintiff's amended petition show that the action was not brought within the period allowed by the statutes of limitation.

The defendant takes the position that the plaintiff, in delivering his bond to the defendant, lost it pursuant to plaintiff's unlawful agreement to pay money lost at gaming, which agreement Section 5965, General Code, declares void; that any cause of action to recover it arose immediately upon the delivery of the bond; and that such cause of action was barred by virtue of the statutes of limitation…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Spring Co. v. KnowltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. J. E. Burke & Co. v. BuckNevada Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Kearney v. WebbIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Reizenstein v. MarquardtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
  5. Bernard v. TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1893

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Houser v. Ohio Historical SocietyOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Scolaro v. BellittoOhio Court of Appeals · 1962
  3. Houser v. Ohio Historical SocietyOhio Court of Appeals · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API