Legal Opinion

Houser v. Ohio Historical Society

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 16, 1977No. 465PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGrey, J.

This is an appeal from the Marietta Municipal Court. Appellant makes two assignments of error:

“1. The judgment was manifestly against the weight of the evidence and contrary to the applicable rules of law.
“2. Trial court erred in finding the statute of limitations barred the filing of the replevin action founded upon contracts in writing.”

The first assignment of error is given in general terms and the second more exactly, but both raise essentially the same point and we shall therefore consider them together.

The record discloses the following facts: Mary Dana Houser was a descendant of Israel…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Campbell v. WhoriskeyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
  2. Shaw v. SillowayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  3. Brady v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  4. Slack v. BryanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1945
  5. Toledo Trust Co. v. SimmonsOhio Court of Appeals · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Houser v. Ohio Historical SocietyOhio Supreme Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API