People v. Winnetka V.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NEWMAN, J.
These are consolidated appeals from orders declaring the minor to be a ward of the court (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 602)1 and *590committing her to the California Youth Authority (CYA), and from a subsequent order denying her petition to modify that commitment order (§ 778).
The wardship was predicated on findings that she committed acts of attempted robbery and assault with a deadly weapon. On this appeal she does not question the sufficiency of the evidence to support those findings; nor does she complain of the conduct of the adjudication (jurisdictional) hearing. Accordingly, for…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- People v. RamirezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Kirkpatrick v. Edgar M.California Supreme Court · 1975
- People v. DrakeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re WinnetkaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980