Legal Opinion

People v. Winnetka V.

California Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1980No. Crim. No. 21142PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

NEWMAN, J.

These are consolidated appeals from orders declaring the minor to be a ward of the court (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 602)1 and *590committing her to the California Youth Authority (CYA), and from a subsequent order denying her petition to modify that commitment order (§ 778).

The wardship was predicated on findings that she committed acts of attempted robbery and assault with a deadly weapon. On this appeal she does not question the sufficiency of the evidence to support those findings; nor does she complain of the conduct of the adjudication (jurisdictional) hearing. Accordingly, for…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. People v. RamirezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Kirkpatrick v. Edgar M.California Supreme Court · 1975
  5. People v. DrakeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re WinnetkaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API