In re Iseman

This grievance proceeding charges M. Daniel Iseman with failing to preserve the identity of funds and property of a client in violation of DR9-102 of the Rules of Disciplinary Procedure. The Panel recommended that the complaint be dismissed. The Executive Committee disagreed with the Panel’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. It recommended that Respondent Iseman receive a public reprimand. We agree with the Executive Committee.

Respondent Iseman’s law practice was primarily concentrated in the commercial real estate area. His primary role in his law firm was to attract clients and work…