Legal Opinion
Hamrick Const. Corp. v. RAINSVILLE HOUSING AUTH.
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided March 2, 1984No. 82-517PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
This is an appeal from an order and judgment quashing garnishments and executions against the defendant housing authorities.
Hamrick Construction Corporation recovered judgments against the Rainsville Housing Authority and the Housing Authority of the City of Boaz. Hamrick sought execution against the housing authorities' real property and filed garnishments against several banks holding money belonging to the housing authorities.
The housing authorities filed a motion to quash the garnishments,1 stating that they were prohibited by Code 1975, § 24-1-40, which reads:
"No interest of the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- City of New Orleans v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Board of Trustees of Employees' Retirement System v. TalleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
- State v. Pure Oil Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1951
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Adler v. Lincoln Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1993
- WM Mobile Bay Environmental Center, Inc. v. The City of Mobile Solid Waste AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
- Guntersville Housing Authority v. StephensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Rainsville Housing Authority v. Hamrick Construction Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1984