Legal Opinion

Rainsville Housing Authority v. Hamrick Construction Corp.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 31, 1984No. 83-154PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALMON, Justice.

This is an appeal 'from a judgment granting a writ of mandamus ordering the defendant housing authorities to pay judgments previously obtained against them by the plaintiff. We recently decided an appeal involving the same controversy wherein we affirmed the trial court’s order quashing garnishments against the housing authorities. Hamrick Construction Corp. v. Rainsville Housing Authority, 447 So.2d 1295 (Ala.1984). The trial court granted the instant writ of mandamus after it quashed the garnishments and before this Court affirmed that order.

In the former appeal, we noted…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Martin v. Loeb & Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  2. Mayor of Anniston v. HurtSupreme Court of Alabama · 1903
  3. Rayborn v. Housing Authority of Washington CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
  4. Hamrick Const. Corp. v. RAINSVILLE HOUSING AUTH.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  5. Logan v. Town of Frisco CitySupreme Court of Alabama · 1981

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Adler v. Lincoln Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1993
  2. WM Mobile Bay Environmental Center, Inc. v. The City of Mobile Solid Waste AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
  3. Bessemer Board of Education v. TuckerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008
  4. Neiditz v. Hartford Housing Authority, No. Cvh 5221 (Nov. 8, 1995)Connecticut Superior Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API