Legal Opinion
Rossi v. Douglas
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided October 21, 2001No. [No. 21, October Term, 1953.]PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSobeloff, C. J.
The issue here presented for determination is the correct construction of a lease: does it include all or only a portion of a piece of vacant land in the rear of the store property mentioned in the instrument?
Appellants, Samuel Rossi, Biagio Ambrogi, and their wives, are the owners of three lots, 6, 7 and 8, in Suitland Corners, a subdivision in Prince George’s County. We are immediately concerned with number 8, a corner lot, and the other two come under consideration only in connection with certain arguments advanced by the parties on the basis of a comparison between the terms of the lease…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ray v. EuriceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1952
- Vincent v. PalmerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1941
- McKeever v. Washington Heights Realty Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
- Spitze v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1892
- Western Maryland Dairy Corp. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1935
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Data General Corp. v. Grumman Systems Support Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Canaras v. Lift Truck Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Slice v. Carozza Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- Higgins v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- Creamer v. HelferstayCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.