Legal Opinion
Pac-One, Inc. v. Daly
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided November 28, 2000No. ED 78149PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CRAHAN, Judge.
Pac-One, Inc., (“Taxpayer”) appeals the judgment dismissing its petition in mandamus seeking to compel the License Collector of the City of St. Louis (“Collector”) to recover and impound taxes paid under protest pursuant to section 139.031 RSMo Cum.Supp.1999.1 We affirm.
The relevant facts are not in dispute. Taxpayer is a manufacturer located in the City of St. Louis and is subject to the manufacturer’s tax pursuant to the provisions of section 150.300 et. seq. Collector is responsible for assessment and collection of the tax. Taxpayer received a 1998 manufacturer’s tax bill…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bergman v. MillsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
- Buck v. LeggettSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
- Xerox Corp. v. TraversSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
- Council House Redevelopment Corp. v. HillSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
- Ryder Student Transportation Services, Inc. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ford Motor Co. v. City of HazelwoodMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
- Twelve Oaks Motor Inn, Inc. v. StrahanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
- Boxes, Inc. v. DalyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- Mark Boles, Respondent/Cross-Appellant v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 2024