Legal Opinion

Bergman v. Mills

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 5, 1999No. WD 56874, WD 56892 and WD 56893PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a consolidated appeal from three separate lawsuits, all relating to the official ballot summary for a referendum on carrying concealed weapons, which is to be voted on by the citizenry on April 6, 1999. 1 The issue on this appeal is the legal effect of Section B of House Bill 1891, which purports to dictate the ballot title for the referendum in question.

FACTS

On May 15, 1998, the General Assembly adopted House Bill 1891, a bill directing that a referendum be submitted to the people concerning whether citizens who apply and meet certain requirements should be permitted to carry…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Bowsher v. SynarSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Americans United v. RogersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  3. State Ex Rel. Webster v. Lehndorff Geneva, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1988
  4. Menorah Medical Center v. Health & Educational Facilities AuthoritySupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  5. Akin v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Brown v. Missouri Secretary of StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  2. United Gamefowl Breeders Ass'n of Missouri v. NixonSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000
  3. Cures Without Cloning v. PundMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Overfelt v. McCaskillMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Missouri Municipal League v. CarnahanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API