Legal Opinion
Mayberry v. Prasse
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided October 26, 1971No. 18040PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT PER CURIAM:
Appellants are being detained in the State Correctional Institution at Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. They joined together in filing their pro se complaint seeking damages and injunctive relief against the Superintendent of the Institution and the Commissioner of the Bureau of Corrections, whose official residence is in Harrisburg. Jurisdiction is claimed under the Civil Rights Acts (28 U.S.C. § 1343(1); 42 U.S.C. § 1985) and the Federal Question Section of the Code, 28 U.S.C. § 1331(a). The district court, in denying all relief and directing the clerk of court to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- William J. Bauers, Jr. v. Herbert T. Heisel, JrCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
- Urbano v. CalissiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
- Urbano v. CalissiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
- Allan H. Lawson v. Arthur T. Prasse, Commissioner of CorrectionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
- Richard J. Mayberry v. James F. Maroney, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution, Pittsburgh, PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
3Cited by5 opinions
- Joseph Fischer v. Hon. William T. Cahill, Governor of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- Bart J. Dougherty v. Harper's Magazine CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Paul B. Owens v. Joseph R. Brierley, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution, Pittsburgh, PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
- Mills v. LarsonDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
- Mayberry v. PrasseCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971