Legal Opinion

Minjie Zheng v. Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers

District Court, C.D. California

Decided September 16, 2025No. 2:25-cv-06124Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MINJIE ZHENG, Case No. 2:25-cv-06124-SPG-AJR 11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S 12 v. MOTION TO REMAND [ECF NO. 43] 13 14 INTERNET CORPORATION FOR ASSIGNED NAMES AND NUMBERS; 15 VERISIGN, INC.; and BEIJING XINNET 16 DIGITAL INFORMATION 17 TECHNOLOGY CO. LTD., Defendants. 18 19 20 Before the Court is the Motion to Remand (ECF No. 43 (“Motion to Remand”)) filed 21 by Plaintiff Minjie Zheng (“Plaintiff”). Also before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss 22 (ECF No. 14 (“Motion to Dismiss”)) filed by Defendant…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  4. Susan Kanter Sharon Plunk v. Warner-Lambert Co. And Pfizer Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  5. Grancare v. Ruth ThrowerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API