Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. McCarthy

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 13, 1932PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonahue, J.

The defendant was found guilty by a jury at a trial on two indictments numbered 18975 and 18976. The defendant excepted to the refusal of the judge to give two requests for instructions with reference to the indictment numbered 18975, and to a portion of the judge’s charge with reference to the same indictment, to the denial of the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict of not guilty on both indictments, and to the exclusion of two questions asked a witness for the Commonwealth on cross-examination.

Certain portions of the testimony as to which there is no dispute are here briefly…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte CurtisSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Ashley v. Three Justices of the Superior CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  3. Commonwealth v. LobelMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  4. Commonwealth v. WhiteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MannosMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  2. State v. MillerArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Commonwealth v. BarkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  4. R. C. McCormick Cross v. Edwin W. Edwards, Etc., CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  5. Bauers v. CornettCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API