Legal Opinion

King v. Morrison Motor Freight Lines

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 13, 1959No. 732PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFess, J.

This is an appeal on questions of law from a judgment entered upon a verdict for the defendant rendered upon direction of the court at the conclusion of plaintiff’s opening statement.

From the opening statement it appears that a truck of the defendant, hauling a number of barrels or drums of chlorosulphonic acid, came into collision with a railroad train, as a result of which a number of such drums were scattered over and adjacent to the railroad crossing. Plaintiff’s employer, Kaiser Chevrolet, was engaged by the defendant to remove the resulting debris. Chlorosulphonie acid is a highly…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Davis v. Charles Shutrump & Sons Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Bosjnak v. Superior Sheet Steel Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Hozian v. Crucible Steel Casting Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Neckel v. FoxOhio Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Ellis v. Victor Electric Products, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Montanez v. CassNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Millhouse v. General Tire & Rubber Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. St. Julian v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.Lucas County Court of Common Pleas · 1978
  4. Montanez v. CassNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. State Ex Rel. Ridge v. MoonOhio Court of Appeals · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API