King v. Morrison Motor Freight Lines
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtFess, J.
This is an appeal on questions of law from a judgment entered upon a verdict for the defendant rendered upon direction of the court at the conclusion of plaintiff’s opening statement.
From the opening statement it appears that a truck of the defendant, hauling a number of barrels or drums of chlorosulphonic acid, came into collision with a railroad train, as a result of which a number of such drums were scattered over and adjacent to the railroad crossing. Plaintiff’s employer, Kaiser Chevrolet, was engaged by the defendant to remove the resulting debris. Chlorosulphonie acid is a highly…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Davis v. Charles Shutrump & Sons Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1942
- Bosjnak v. Superior Sheet Steel Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1945
- Hozian v. Crucible Steel Casting Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1937
- Neckel v. FoxOhio Supreme Court · 1924
- Ellis v. Victor Electric Products, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Montanez v. CassNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
- Millhouse v. General Tire & Rubber Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1983
- St. Julian v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.Lucas County Court of Common Pleas · 1978
- Montanez v. CassNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
- State Ex Rel. Ridge v. MoonOhio Court of Appeals · 1963