Legal Opinion

Robinson v. Village of Lancaster

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 18, 1992PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion denied, cross motion granted and complaint dismissed. Memorandum: Special Term erred by denying defendant’s cross motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint for failure to file a timely notice of claim. Plaintiff did not serve a notice of claim within 90 days of the accident and did not move for permission to serve a late notice of claim within one year and 90 days following the accident (General Municipal Law § 50-e [5]; Pierson v City of New York, 56 NY2d 950, 954). Plaintiff argues that, because the Statute of Limitations was tolled…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pierson v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Berkshire Life Insurance v. FernandezNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Long Island Citizens Campaign, Inc. v. County of NassauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  4. Peach Laboratories, Inc. v. Irvington Union Free School DistrictNew York Supreme Court · 1991

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wilson v. City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. Patten v. Hamburg OB/GYN Group, P.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API