United States v. García-Álvarez
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge.
Following a jury trial, Ángel García-Ál-varez (“García”) was convicted of carjacking and firearms offenses. Thereafter, the district court denied his motion for new trial, finding that the evidence it was premised on was not newly discovered. Garcia now appeals his conviction on sufficiency and evidentiary grounds, and challenges the denial of his motion for a new trial- Following a careful review, we reject all of Garcia’s claims and affirm the district court.
I. Background
A. Facts
As Garcia challenges the sufficiency of the evidence proffered against him, we recite…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Holloway v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- United States v. DrougasCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Lavandris JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- United States v. Castro-DavisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
- Robinson v. CookCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Garcia-AlvarezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Campo FloresCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Melendez-RivasCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.