Bennett v. Ahrens
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtSparks, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above).
The technical questions of pleading raised by appellees are perhaps not without merit, but we are disposed to «lay, them aside and proceed to the contested issues raised by ap-pellees’ demurrer to appellant’s replication.
Appellant contends that the sheriff of St. Clair county was not empowered to execute a warrant directed to the sheriff of Jackson county. In his declaration, and also in his replication, appellant alleges that in doing all the things complained of with relation to this transaction appellees were acting for and on behalf of themselves and on…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Marcovitz v. HergenretherIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
- State ex rel. Isenring v. PolacheckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
- Smith v. JonesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1884
- Big Creek Coal Co. v. TannerIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
- Ross v. ClarkIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rishel v. Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
- Homan Mfg. Co. v. RussoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1956
- Homan Mfg. Co. v. RussoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1956