Metropolitan State Bank v. McNutt
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Allen
This is an action upon a promissory note. The note *292contained an authorization of confession of judgment. At first, judgment was taken by confession. It was after-wards vacated, and defendant given leave to file an answer. The case was tried upon the issues tendered by the defendant’s answer. At the close of the evidence, the court found for the defendant, and judgment was entered accordingly. The plaintiff has sued out this writ of error.
The promissory note involved in this case was executed and delivered by defendant to The Service Truck Sales Company, on August 31, 1920. It is for the sum…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Burson v. HuntingtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
- Merchants' Bank v. McClellandSupreme Court of Colorado · 1886
- Lutton v. BakerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
- Farmers Savings Bank v. NeelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
- Hukill v. McGinnisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1921
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Terrell v. Walter E. Heller & CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
- Stewart v. Public Industrial BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929