Legal Opinion
Bowden v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 7, 1962No. 2354PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
137 So.2d 621 (1962)
Henry Frank BOWDEN, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 2354.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.
February 7, 1962.
Edward C. Flood, Bartow, for appellant.
Richard W. Ervin, Atty. Gen., and Robert R. Crittenden, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
WHITE, Judge.
The appellant, as defendant below, was found and adjudged guilty of the crime of incest.[1] The principal point urged on appeal is that the trial court committed reversible error in refusing to order blood grouping tests sought by the defendant as evidence in the case.
The complaining witness was the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. DammSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
- Hays v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- Settles v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1918
- Seymour v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1913
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Urga v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
- Farnell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
- Tejeda-Bermudez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Henry Frank Bowden v. Louie Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections, State of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967