Legal Opinion
United States v. 38 DOZEN BOTTLES, ETC.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided September 4, 1953No. Civ. A. 2317PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BELL, District Judge.
This is a seizure action brought under Section 304(a) of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C.A. § 334(a). It was begun by the filing of a libel of information charging that the seized article was a drug which had been shipped in interstate commerce by the Rhodes Pharmacal Company of Cleveland, Ohio, and that the article was misbranded while in interstate commerce under 21 U.S.C.A. § 352(f)(1) by reason of the failure of its labeling' to bear adequate directions for use. The charges arise out of the following facts.
A full-page advertisement for “Tryptacin”…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Charles of the Ritz Distributors Corp. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Aronberg v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
- United States v. 88 Cases, More or Less, Containing Bireley's Orange BeverageCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
- United States v. 46 CARTONS, ETC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1953
- United States v. 62 Packages, More or LessDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1943
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Zippo Manufacturing Company v. Rogers Imports, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1963
- Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. Allstate Driving School, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1969
- United States v. Articles of DrugCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- National Association of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers and National Pharmaceutical Alliance v. Food and Drug AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- United States v. AN ARTICLE OF FOOD, ETC.District Court, E.D. New York · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.