Legal Opinion
Autorama Corp. v. Stewart
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided October 7, 1986No. 84-2637PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHILSON, District Judge.
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. FED.R. APP.P. 34(a), Tenth Circuit Rule 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
On June 7, 1983, appellees, Autorama Corporation and Ronald I. Swanson, as plaintiffs, filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma, premised upon federal question jurisdiction. The plaintiffs alleged that in certain…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- White v. New Hampshire Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Ruckelshaus v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,755, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,074 William B. Weinberger v. James C. Kendrick, Charles M. CoyneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Michele E. Shepherd and Larue Graves v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- Robert Stewart v. Donald DongesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Federal Trade Commission v. Freecom Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Poole v. Textron, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2000
- Hilst v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.