Tenica & Associates, Inc v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
Bid Protest Jurisdiction; 28 U.S.C. § 1491(b)(1); Preliminary Injunction; Mootness; Ripeness; Standing
OPINION AND ORDER
CAMPBELL-SMITH, Chief Judge
In this bid protest case, TENICA &.Associates, LLC (TENICA) challenges actions taken by the Department of Defense, Defense Human Resources Activity (DHRA) to procure support staff services for the Family Employer Programs and Policy Office (FEPP), a component of the DHRA This matter is before, the court on plaintiffs motion for preliminary injunction. Dissatisfied with the procurement process, plaintiff seeks to enjoin DHRA from allowing performance…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Rex Service Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Systems Application & Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Ramcor Services Group, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Savantage Financial Services, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- National Air Cargo Group, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Texas ex rel. Texas Workforce Commission v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Goodwill Industries of South Florida, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
- MCI Diagnostic Center, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
- Newimar, S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.