Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Smith

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 2014No. 85809-8Published

1Concurrence

¶27 (concurring in result) — I agree with the result reached by the majority opinion, but I write separately because our open courts jurisprudence has become increasingly complex and confusing. We adopted the logic and experience test as the method by which judges can determine whether a particular phase of trial is subject to the Washington Constitution’s command that justice shall *522be administered openly. Const, art. I, §§ 10, 22; State v. Sublett, 176 Wn.2d 58, 292 P.3d 715 (2012) (plurality opinion). But this case and other pending cases reveal that it is difficult and confusing, if not…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., County of RiversideSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. State v. ScottWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. KirkmanWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. KirkmanWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. O'HaraWashington Supreme Court · 2009

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API