Legal Opinion

Aldinger v. Close

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 9, 1925No. 24,336PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hoi/r, J.

The sole question presented by the appeal is the validity of a mortgage foreclosure by advertisement where, before the publication of the notice of sale, an action was pending in another state to recover upon the notes secured by the mortgage, which action was dismissed two weeks before the date of sale.

Section 8107, O. S. 1913, provides: “Every mortgage of real estate heretofore or hereafter executed, containing a power of sale, upon default being made in any condition thereof, may be foreclosed by advertisement within fifteen years after the maturing of said mortgage or the debt…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Austro-Hungarian Consul v. G. A. WestphalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  2. Miller v. American Bonding Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  3. Peaslee v. RidgwaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  4. Salmon v. Central Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  5. Jones v. EwingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ruiz v. 1st Fidelity Loan Servicing, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  2. Randall L. Twait v. MidFirst BankCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
  3. Sandra Fiecke-Stifter v. MidCountry BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2026
  4. Terry v. HeppnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API