Legal Opinion · Dissent

State ex rel. Indiana Department of Revenue v. Deaton

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 22, 2000No. 73A01-0002-CV-49Published

1DissentFriedlander, Judge

I believe the Shelby Superior Court lacked jurisdiction to grant any relief to taxpayers. I therefore respectfully dissent. The Deatons filed an income tax return that did not include payment of the taxes due. The Department, through administrative proceedings, established the amount of taxes and penalties owed by the Deatons. After the Deatons’ initial protest of the assessment, they made no attempt to pursue judicial remedies in accordance with the applicable statutes. The statutes require exhaustion of administrative remedies. Judicial review on any theory arising under the tax statutes is…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. SprolesIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Bank of Kansas v. DavisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  3. Borgman v. AikensIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. State Board of Tax Commissioners v. MontgomeryIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Carpenter v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API