Legal Opinion

Rose v. United Equitable Insurance Co.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 3, 2002No. 20020094, 20020095PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARING, Justice.

[¶ 1] United Equitable Insurance Company (“United Equitable”) and Standard Life and Accident Insurance Company (“Standard”) appealed from an order certifying a class action under N.D.R.Civ.P. 23. We affirm, concluding the district court did not abuse its discretion in certifying the class action.

I

[¶ 2] In 1982, Frank Rose purchased a guaranteed renewable nursing home insurance policy from United Equitable. United Equitable Life Insurance Company (“United Life”), the parent company of United Equitable, sold identical nursing home policies in North Dakota. In 1986, Standard…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Richardson v. ByrdCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  2. Werlinger v. Champion Healthcare Corp.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Werlinger v. Champion Healthcare Corp.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. KensmoeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Rose v. United Equitable Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re South Dakota Microsoft Antitrust LitigationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Rakes v. Life Investors Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  3. Howe v. Microsoft Corp.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Jundt v. Jurassic Resources DevelopmentNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Baker v. Autos, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2015

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API