Moore v. Lee Tire & Rubber Co. of New York, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Utah; Tillman D. Johnson, Judge. Action at law by the Dee Tire & Rubber Company of New York, Incorporated, against L. C. Moore and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
CARLAND, Circuit Judge.
The parties will be referred to as in the trial, court. The plaintiff brought this action against defendants to recover a balance of $5,120, claimed to be due and owing from them as copartners under the firm name and style of E. C. Moore Company for goods, wares, and merchandise sold to them as such copartners. At the trial both parties at the close of all the evidence moved for a directed verdict. The defendants also requested what is called a declaration of law. The court directed a verdict for the plaintiff and refused the so-called declaration of law. Defendants…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Slocum v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- La Crosse Plow Co. v. PagenstecherCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1918
- International Harvester Co. v. PattersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1919
3Cited by2 opinions
- United Factors Division of United Merchants & Manufacturers, Inc. v. MurphyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1971
- Marks Bros. Paving Co. v. Mt. Vernon Homes, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963