Legal Opinion

United States v. Waltham Watch Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 5, 1942PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RIFKIND, District Judge.

Defendants in each of the above-entitled actions have demurred to an indictment charging them with having engaged in an unlawful combination and conspiracy in restraint of interstate trade and commerce in violation of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 1. Some of the defendants have also moved to quash the indictments. One defendant in- each action is the manufacturer of watches and watch products and the others are officers of such manufacturer, accredited distributors of watches and watch products, and officers of such distributors. Except for differences as to names,…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. United States v. CruikshankSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  4. United States v. Colgate & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
  5. Hagner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. National Lead Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1945
  2. United States v. General Electric Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1948
  3. Professional & Business Men's Life Insurance v. Bankers Life Co.District Court, D. Montana · 1958
  4. United States v. United States Steel CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1964
  5. United States v. SchineDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API