Legal Opinion

Keeney v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 3, 1977No. 10796PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Movant’s petition for writ of error coram nobis was denied after an evidentiary hearing. No motion for a new trial was filed. Acting pro se, movant prepared and sent to the circuit clerk a notice of appeal “from the judgment . . entered herein on July 14, 1977.” Contrary to Rule 81.04, Y.A.M.R., in that it was not accompanied by the requisite $20.00 docket fee and there was then no court order waiving same, appellant’s notice of appeal was improvidently accepted and filed by the circuit clerk on July 20, 1977. Sixty-one days after the judgment of July 14,1977, or on September 13, 1977, the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. BrookshireSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
  2. State v. WorlMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Application of HoltMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. State v. KeeneyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. State v. PeckMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Prowswood, Inc. v. Mountain Fuel Supply Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. LawsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Prowswood, Inc. v. Mountain Fuel Supply Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. DittmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API