Schwarzkopf Development Corporation v. Ti-Coating, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ON MOTION TO DISMISS OR TRANSFER
PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.
ORDER
Appellee Schwarzkopf Development Corporation (SDC) moves to dismiss or transfer this appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1631 for lack of appellate jurisdiction in the Federal Circuit.
The complaint raised claims in contract and (as amended) contract-related tort. The action was initiated by SDC in state court and, before Ti-Coating’s answer was filed, was transferred to federal court on diversity grounds. The answer filed in federal court contained patent-related defenses and a counterclaim that included patent counts. The counterclaim…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- The Fair v. Kohler Die & Specialty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- American Well Works Company v. Layne and Bowler CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Pratt v. Paris Gas Light & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Luckett v. Delpark, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Atari, Inc. v. Js & a Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- James B. Royal v. Leading Edge Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- In Re Innotron DiagnosticsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Abbott Laboratories, Andrew J. Muetterties and Joseph N. Genese, Plaintiffs/cross-Appellants v. John F. BrennanCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Donald D. Gronholz v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Reading & Bates Construction Co. v. Baker Energy Resources Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1998
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.