Flory v. Comstock
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Kent. (Montgomery, J.) Case. Defendant brings error. The facts are summarized at commencement of head-notes.
1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, J.
On the twenty-ninth day of November, 1880, the defendant leased a farm, lying near Grand Bapids, to Enos and Peter Elory, and at the same time sold them stock and other personal property to enable them to carry on the milk business, and took back a chattel mortgage for the purchase price, viz., $429.
The Elorys were brothers and copartners in the trade, and during the winter of 18S0 and 1881, after making the lease and purchasing the stock,. purchased of the defendant a quantity of hay and other feed, to the value of $200, for which Enos Elory, on the twenty-second day of March, 1881, gave…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Briggs v. MetteMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
3Cited by1 opinion
- Nation v. Planters and Mechanics BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911