Legal Opinion

Mercer v. Nelson

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 2, 1987No. 87-162PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Steele Hays, Justice.

Appellants Freddie and Mollie Mercer brought this damage suit alleging negligence by William Nelson in colliding with the rear of Mrs. Mercer’s vehicle while she was stopped in a line of traffic. Nelson’s answer was a general denial and an allegation of contributory negligence. In trial Nelson testified he was struck from behind by another motorist (Ricky Dan Cook) and knocked into the plaintiff. The proof was conflicting as to whether Nelson struck Mrs. Mercer before or after being struck by Cook. Nelson asked the trial court to instruct the jury on intervening proximate…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Lucille L. FugateCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  2. Myrtie Hopkins v. Condon Wasson, Robert Hamilton, Joe Ledford, J. A. Ware, Joe Harris and LesterhaneyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
  3. Dooley v. Cecil Edwards Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1984
  4. Smith v. F & C Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
  5. O'Guinn Volkswagen, Inc. v. LawsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sumner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1991
  2. Mollenhour v. State First National Bank of TexarkanaCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API