Legal Opinion

Mikeska v. City of Galveston

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided August 2, 2004No. CIV.A. G-02-045Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

KENT, District Judge.

This lawsuit arises out of the alleged unlawful taking by the City of Galveston, Texas (“the City”), of property owned by Plaintiffs Wayne and Janice Mikeska (“the Mikeskas”) and Mose and Carol Smith (“the Smiths”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”). Now before the Court comes the City’s Motion for Summary Judgment. For the reasons stated below, the Motion is hereby GRANTED.

I. Background and Facts

Texas divides the land along the Texas Gulf Coast into three zones: submerged land, “wet beach,” and “dry beach.” The submerged…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API