Legal Opinion
Boeck v. State Highway Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided October 31, 1967PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.
The issue is the sufficiency of the service of the jurisdictional offer.
The procedure to be used by the State Highway Commission to obtain highway scenic easements is set forth in sec. 32.05, Stats. Pursuant to this section the highway commission attempted to obtain the easement by negotiation. The offer made was rejected by the plaintiffs. The Highway Commission was then required to give notice of a jurisdictional offer.
Sec. 32.05 (4), Stats., provides how notice of a jurisdictional offer must be given. The pertinent provisions of the statute are as follows:
“How Notice Of Jurisdictional…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hurley v. . OlcottNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Simmons v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Wisconsin Power & Light Co. v. DeanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- McCoy v. State Employment BureauOhio Court of Appeals · 1947
- In re Leterman, Becher & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. CollovaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Resseguie v. American Mutual Liability InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
- Mund v. RamboughNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Schroedel Corp. v. State Highway CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. KempWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.