Legal Opinion
In re the Adoption of Daniel C.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided October 30, 1984PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs.
We do not find it necessary to reach the question whether section 115-b of the Domestic Relations Law requires that a consent form recite the effect of a notice of revocation set forth in subdivision 1 (par [d], cl [ii]) of that section or appellant’s contention that a consent form which fails to do so is constitutionally infirm. By reason of appellant’s counsel’s concession that she did not claim to have been misled by the form, the adoptive parents were foreclosed from introducing evidence…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- In re Leon RRNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- In re the Adoption of Male Infant L. Christina L.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Carpenter v. . Buffalo General Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1914
- In re Marie B.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- In re Sarah K.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Allstate Insurance v. LibowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Prego v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Majewski v. Broadalbin-Perth Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Cherry v. KochAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.