Legal Opinion
Novack & Randall v. National Hot Rod Ass'n
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided July 3, 1967No. [No. 476, September Term, 1966.]PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHammond, C. J.
The issue before us is whether The National Hot Rod Association (Hot Rod), a non-profit California corporation which-sponsors and regulates automobile drag races, had sufficient contacts with Maryland to make it legally and constitutionally amenable to suit in Maryland on a cause of action related to its-corporate activities in the State (a suit by an automobile drag, race driver who had been injured on a track sanctioned as safe by Hot Rod and a similar suit by the widow of a deceased' driver).
Hot Rod is “a drag racing organization,” which organizes- and sponsors four automobile speed race…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Longines-Wittnauer Watch Co. v. Barnes & Reinecke, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1965
- Bomze v. Nardis Sportswear, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Mouzavires v. BaxterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- Mohamed v. MichaelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- McLaughlin v. CopelandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1977
- Geelhoed v. JensenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
- Krashes v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.