Legal Opinion
Vulcan Detinning Co. v. American Can Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey
Decided February 29, 1904PublishedCited by 2 opinions
On Motion to Remand to State Court.
1Opinion of the Court
KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.
The Vulcan Detinning Company filed its bill in chancery in New Jersey, alleging itself the owner of a valuable secret process for detinning scrap, and setting forth that one Assman had been by them intrusted with said secret, and, in violation of the trust so reposed in him, had divulged to the American Can Company, which he caused to be incorporated, the said secret process, and that the said American Can Company have erected plants for the purpose of operating under said process the secret which they had fraudulently obtained. .The bill further alleges that the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Torrence v. SheddSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Starin v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. IdeSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Pirie v. TvedtSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Gwillim v. DonnellanSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re Griffin Bros.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 1907
- State ex rel. Public Service Co. of Indiana, Inc. v. Pike Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1963